|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Home | About us | Publications | Working papers | Workshops | Links | Site map | Tiếng Việt |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Industrial Policy Symposium To mark VDF's First Anniversary
Prof. Phong makes a statement, three speakers are listening. The Vietnam Development Forum became one year old in February 2005. In our first year, we were very busy building research networks on such topics as industry, trade, social security, street children, environment, aid policy, macroeconomy, etc. with a large number of people and organizations inside and outside Vietnam. We organized four research missions to HCMC, Japan and Thailand; held 44 workshops and about 100 research meetings in Hanoi and Tokyo; published two books, five discussion papers, one policy note and one joint report with ADB; participated in international conferences and programs, and hosted two rounds of research competition with 10 winners. VDF is part of the 21st Century Center of Excellence Program funded by Japan's Ministry of Education, Culture, Sports, Science and Technology (MEXT). To mark our first anniversary, VDF hosted a symposium on industrial strategy formulation, a topic crucial to VDF, in Hanoi on March 24, 2005. It was opened by Prof. Nguyen Van Thuong (VDF/NEU Rector). H.E. Hoang Trung Hai (Minister of Industry) gave the first presentation raising three key issues, followed by a presentation by Prof. Kenichi Ohno (VDF/GRIPS) which compared policy making methodology between Thailand and Vietnam. Subsequently, there was a lively discussion.
Minister's remark (PDF261KB) Prof. Ohno's presentation V (PDF530KB) Prof. Ohno's presentation E (PDF288KB)
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
MOI Minister Hai -- Three critical issues
Three issues are offered for consideration:
(1) how to evaluate the current performance of Vietnam's
industrialization--quantitative growth is impressive but modernization and
technical depth lag behind; (2) industrial strategy up to 2020 under
globalization--policy methodology, criteria of becoming an industrial
country, Vietnam's positioning in the global and regional economy,
strategic thinking, etc. must be clarified; and (3) choice of leading
industries--MOI has three classification of competitive advantage
industries, fundamental industries and potential industries. When choosing
leading industries, dynamic comparative advantage must be analyzed. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Prof. Ohno's presentation -- How Thailand does it
VDF and MOI organized a joint mission to
Thailand in early March 2005. Thailand has experienced four decades of FDI-led
industrialization and created substantial agglomeration in automobile and
electronics. Under the current strong Thaksin administration,
industry-specific committees and institutes are set up as key instruments
for designing, implementing and adjusting master plans. Private producers
are active and they, not the government, propose numerical targets in the
master plan. Vietnam can study Thai lessons in national positioning,
strategic marketing, private-sector channels, and master plan contents and
methodology. But Thailand also has the serious problems of slow technology
absorption and weak human resources (engineers and managers). Vietnam
should plan to overcome these problems from the early stage of
industrialization. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Mr. Okada's intervention -- We like VN but business climate is not conducive I have worked six years
in Vietnam. We like Vietnam very much, but as a business enterprise we
must make a choice among many potential host countries. Matsushita has 48
factories in China, 15 in Malaysia, 10 in Thailand but only 2 in Vietnam.
I want to promote Vietnam as an FDI host country but the business
environment is not yet attractive. Let me give some examples: (1) import
duties are often suddenly changed without prior consultation; (2) part
tariffs from non-ASEAN countries are still high; and (3) for some
products, the responsible ministry is not clear (electronic home
appliances are torn between MOI and MPT). |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
|
Prof. Phong's intervention -- Need for new methodology and criteria
Vietnam's achievement in the last 15 years has
been good, but we face new challenges. I agree with the Minister that new
methodology and theory to guide our policy making is needed. We also need
to create proper criteria for becoming "an industrialized country" by
2020. It must be based on modern technology with a strong service sector.
The structures of GDP, labor and population should be considered. It is
also necessary to focus on the education level of the labor force. Science
and technology, "level playing field" for all sectors, high-tech and
labor-intensive industries, and supporting industries must be emphasized. |
||||||||||||||||||||||||
![]() Reception desk and VDF activity displays
Since the establishment of VDF in Feb. 2004, industrial policy has always
been our major interest and concern. We have conducted many visits, workshops
and policy discussions on various aspects of Vietnam's industrial strategy in
the context of regional competition and accelerating integration. We are pleased
to bring the highlights of our first year's research in a book form.
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||